> > > > >I've looked at the way BONE was designed, and although it may be > > > fast, > > >it is quite ugly. > > > > Just out of curiosity, what about BONE struck you as ugly? All I > > know > > about BONE is what I read in the Be Newsletter article that came > > out > > about > > it, and as I recall it sounded quite nice to me... > > Well, first of all, it's OOP in C, which is often a recipe for > ugliness. The code I've seen (*not* leaked, the sample headers that > were released) was a complete mess. Also, doing things in the kernel > meant not really being able to interact with user-space apps. For > instance, a net_server addon I wrote once that monitored ethernet > activity put up a deskbar widget. BONE add-ons couldn't do that. > Nope, instead they use ioctl()'s to just those kinds of parameters filled in by the kernel driver. Point being? -- Mikael Jansson, BeDevID #E-20392 http://hem.spray.se/tic_khr/