Daniel wrote: > 3 (.com, .org, .net) gives you 75 domains to register. That's a few > dollars. Well, I don't think we would need all of them (at least I would consider .com and .net optional - that could be done for the winner only, if at all). > This makes me wonder if the name selection should actually be private > and not public afterall. We could privately select a winner, register > the domain(s) and *then* publicly announce the winner. That would > certainly bum alot of people -- including me, because I would prefer > to > keep it open. But then again, I would hate the see the name selection > messed up because the public nature of the process could allow domain > snatchers to mess up our plans. We can have the first vote public, but we would not show the results of the poll. Then we could have a "closed" poll for the remaining set (team leads, whatever). We could acquire the names for the three best choices, and present them as the final completely public vote - that would exclude many people in this intermediate vote, but it would be safe. OTOH I wouldn't want to be excluded from such a vote ;-) > Or am I just being paranoid? Maybe - one cannot know before :-)) Adios... Axel.