> "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > After R1, I want to introduce file system layers, so that we can > > > just > > > plug in generic attribute support for all file systems that don't > > > support them natively. That should also simplify a couple of > > > things > > > :) > > Like .DS_Store and such used in MacOS X? > > How it's realized should be configurable. Personally, I'd prefer to > store those files locally by default, like Marco's cdda-fs does - > that > way, you won't clobber other file systems for no reason, and also > provide this service to read-only volumes. The read-only volume support is questionnable though, are they really read-only then ? Now, things like the EA DATA file on FAT must be handled by dosfs itself, not an upper layer unfortunately, since that very file is actually just a fake file to make sure the clusters won't be reclaimed by scandisk, but the dirents actually have a pointer to the cluster that contains the eas for its node. So much for broken designs :) François.