Moving this to the other mailing list now... 2008/9/2 Jonas Sundstrom <jonas@xxxxxxxxxx>: > "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2008/9/2 Jonas Sundstrom <jonas@xxxxxxxxxx>: > ... >> > I think I´ve mostly thought of Haiku, Inc as just >> > being there, doing what it was supposed to do, >> > without fanfare. >> >> If I may ask, what do you believe that Haiku, Inc. >> does currently? > > Maintaining its status as non-profit, filing/holding > trademarks, receiving/keeping/distributing donations, > holding some copyright to Haiku source. Let's dig a little deeper here :) First, we are struggling to maintain the status as a non-profit - I dare say this is actually the tricky part due to the legal mire we're still trying to get out of (maybe I'm making a big deal out of nothing, but the fact that we haven't fixed it suggests it's the harder part). As for receiving/keeping donations - we're definitely doing that. What we're not necessarily doing well is "distributing donations". The Haiku Code Drive idea was an excellent initiative, and proved to be very popular with the community. I think that it should definitely become a recurring drive each year (assuming the donations are enough each time). As for other uses of the donations, currently they cover the admin costs of the website, the domains, the various fees, etc. that Haiku, Inc. incurs. It also pays for the occasional hardware purchase for a developer, or reimbursement for expenses to help promote or develop Haiku (the recent LinuxWorld exhibit space for example was not free, but we did get a very good deal). I think we need to start budgeting the donations, and publishing this budget so that we can forecast our targets and let the community know how much is needed, and where it's going. This is something that I know several have wanted to do, but we need good ideas that actually work - and planning for events, etc. >> What should it be doing? > > I think those are just fine. Not everything must be > part of Haiku, inc. No, not everything, but certainly more IMO. It almost feels as if Haiku, Inc. has often been treated as a "necessary evil" that the project needed in order to get some things done - but it really could be more :) >> > From the inside point-of-view, how is Haiku, Inc. broken? > ... <snip> > > :/ I haven´t got a clue how to begin solving that > without the cooperation of the current board members. We do still have some contact with M. Phipps, and Tyler as well, so we're not completely on our own :) But the fact remains, we need to finish the transition and fix the other stuff as well. To be honest, the transition team has been at least active in working on business relations (like those with ACCESS, etc), maintaining existing assets (domains, website accounts, store, paypal, etc.), and of course, promoting Haiku (SCaLE, LinuxWorld, etc.) - so we've been busy at least doing various tasks all this time. I suppose one might say, these were the "not completely boring tasks"... who knows. Jorge played a pretty major role in many of these areas, big shoes, which we can only hope to fill. Help is always appreciated. - Urias