[openbeos] Re: gcc
- From: "David A. Rogers" <darogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:08:35 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
Well done you. I look forward to trying it out.
dar
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Oliver Tappe wrote:
>
> On 2004-10-01 at 19:31:57 [+0200], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > "David A. Rogers" <darogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The 3.1 beta version of BEOS Max installs a gcc which declares it's
> > > version as gcc-beos-991026. It also has 2.95.3 which I know is not
> > > correct.
> > >
> > > If gcc-beos-991026 is not correct, where do I get the proper version?
> >
> > 991026 should still work AFAICT, at least for most of the stuff we
> > have.
> > Oliver Tappe is working on a working GCC 2.95.3 release which will
> > hopefully be released shortly. It will then most probably appear in our
> > repository as well.
>
> Yes, that's the plan >:o)
>
> The next version of gcc-2.95.3 is now available from here:
>
> http://www.hirschkaefer.de/beos/gcc-2.95.3-beos-release-20041003.zip
>
> This is meant to be the real thing (i.e. I intend to release this to
> BeBits).
>
> These are the most important changes (as compared to the last
> test-release):
> - gcc is now paired with the current version of binutils (2.15 instead of
> 2.11.2). This fixes the build of userlandfs.
> Thanks to ahwayakchih for helping with the porting of binutils-2.15.
> - an issue with stl_alloc.h has been fixed such that gcc is complaining less
> often about missing references to cerr and the like.
> Thanks to Andrew Bachmann for providing the patch.
> - all texinfo-documentation has been transformed into html, the incomplete
> info and man-docs are no longer part of the distro.
> If anyone thinks it'd be better to keep these in the distribution, please
> let me know.
>
> As usual: please tell me if you encounter any problems.
>
> cheers,
> Oliver
>
>
>
Other related posts:
