David Reid wrote: > > Why not have mkdir add the attribute? > > Seems like a more consistent approach. David Shipman replied: > This wouldn't really solve the problem, since most of the > attributeless > folders > a ) exist already in archives, on peoples harddrives etc > b ) come from other (non-beos) systems (contained in zip files etc), > and thus > will not have the attributes present... > > ..and I still think having stat-based attributes would be really > cool > :) I, for one, would not like to loose the possibility to have multiple, differing mimetypes, for "subclasses" of folders. (like "folder/mp3", "folder/image", etc) Nobody's using folder "filetypes" that way now, afaik, but the attribute -could- be used that way, and it could be nice. /Jonas Sundström. www.kirilla.com