On 2004-11-18 at 14:37:43 [-0500], Mikael Jansson (mailing lists) wrote: > "Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" > > <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > What I'd like to be able to do is to just boot off the CF (for low boot > > > -times), > > > > Aren't most real disks faster than CF? > > (except in seek time) > > > Isn't seeking what's usually limiting you when booting? I have booted from a CF card, too. I did some re-arranging of Be's boot script to make it faster. I eventually got boot time to 9 seconds (after-Post to Tracker). There are some sleep calls in the script that CF users can get rid of. > > > but then hand over everything to a regular IDE disk; swap, home, and > > > other things that regularly change. Having frequently-changing data on a > > > CF will kill it pretty fast with its limited write cycles. Yeah - my goal was a read only volume. Actually, I disabled VM on that particular install. Memory is cheap. ;-D > > There's always ramdisk, NFS, etc. > > > Yeah, but not when you boot. :) Sure, if you had some kind of static RAM that > kept its contents through reboot, but seeing that's not available... :) I keep thinking back to my Amiga days - a ROM with our kernel and app_server... :-)