Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Mikael Jansson wrote: > >>(between us: don't you think that if we would've had a functional > >>BButton, we showed it to the world?) > >> > > > > Of course, but I wouldn't expect a stub to crash. Even if it > > doesn't > > do anything, the draw_32_to_32() function isn't a part of BButton, > > right? > > Nope. As you see it's a part of Blitter class. > > What's a stub? A stub is a simple BWindow class. > BButton requires a lot of functionality. > Okay, I assumed that whatever functions not implemented would be nops, and not crash-ops. :) -- Mikael Jansson http://mikael.jansson.be