Shaka <shaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it too premature to request that we include Tracker in the > bootscript? I have been running it for weeks now and it's not only Current builds are mostly targeted at developers, not users, and for most of the tests at least I am doing, Tracker is not yet needed. I probably wouldn't mind if I weren't mainly using Qemu for testing, though :-) I'd also like to squash down some more bugs before adding Tracker. > stable, it's exciting to watch it boot! Adding "mountvolume -all" as > well to the boot script makes it even more fun! (assuming the new BFS > will not corrupt old BFS partitions, and for me, so far so good) I wouldn't do that yet, at least :) Mounting itself shouldn't do any harm, but as soon as you start writing on those drives, there's definitely a chance they'll got corrupted. Bye, Axel.