[openbeos] Re: Visual design stuff again

  • From: Troy Banther <troybanther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:56:50 -0500

Hello everyone,

I just turned 40 years and have, while certainly not the only one, a unique 
perspective of a world that only had computers in major corporations, 
defense, and NASA. I have seen the rise and fall of a lot of "good" 
technologies and softwares over the years. The operating systems that stand 
out in my book are BSD, Linux, and BeOS. Yes MacOS is in there somewhere 

If you guys can pull this OBOS off - you guys have a wonderful chance to 
code your way into the future and be part of history at the same time. 
Don't, especially if you have small funding for right now, sweat the small 
visual stuff ... work on BeOS' strengths and improve where Be Inc failed.  

As far as the visual stuff for OBOS. I personally change what I want and 

I just want to see OBOS out there in the "real" world being used like 
lesser network operating systems. I would absolutely love to be able to use 
BeOS as a server-level OS. As a sys admin for several small campus networks 
- can you imagine the time saved in just administration and maintenance of 
an OBOS server over it WinCrappy one. As a home user, I want something that 
will allow me to get my work without the constant crashes, hangs, or time 
loss (say personal cash loss), or data loss. If I had a dime for every time 
I had to reboot a WinCrappy machine for one reason or another, I would have 
one heck of a bank account.

Well, I must get to work.


On 2003-09-30 at 06:27:52 [-0500], you wrote:
> "Simon Taylor" <simontaylor1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Well, we as a team don't consider this - we won't spend time
> > > creating
> > > a
> > > new look now. But we will certainly not stop you from developing
> > > your
> > > own "new look" - everybody can do this: on his own. There is only a
> > > very slight chance that any of those efforts will make it into our
> > > tree, and maybe only available via #ifdef anyway.
> > How bad would you feel if I did do it separately though?
> I wouldn't mind.
> > You release R1 quietly, not expecting anyone will really want to use
> > it
> > apart from those few already using R5. I believe that the appeal is
> > wider, so take all of your code, add a couple of hundered lines to
> > change the look, and keep the code private. I push it a bit, send a
> > few
> > copies to a few magazines, get a few screenshots up on computer
> > websites, and sell a few thousand copies at £20 a time. Nice little
> > earner for me (for next to no work), OBOS gets no mention anywhere,
> > no
> > increased interest, no more developers.
> Don't be stupid. We won't release R1 quietly - it will have a good
> momentum when it's out; you will find reviews in magazines etc.
> Sure, you can give it a new look and sell it, but there is no way to
> hide where this is all coming from. You won't sell those copies to
> beginners, but to people who know about its inheritage.
> > That is not something that I would do, but that is not to say that
> > nobody would. All I want is for people to be able to see R1 for what
> > it
> > truly is, for more people to download it (geeks, devs, and users),
> > for
> > more hype to surround the project ready for the release to conquer
> > the
> > world, and for more people to help develop said world-conquering
> > release. There is nothing wrong with "selling" R1 as > R5 - my
> > parents
> > would still have no interest in it at all - you wouldn't be swamped
> > with clueless users. What would happen is geeks, current- and ex-Be
> > users would be much more interested in R1, and then they could help
> > to
> > spread the word to others, ready for R2.
> Yes. So what? I don't get your point.
> BTW our license allows you to sell R1, so go ahead :)
> Bye,
>    Axel.
troy banther. avid beos and freebsd user
mySite: http://banther-trx.homeunix.com
compassion is the answer - go vegan

Other related posts: