[haiku] Re: This is not an article

From: "Jorge G. Mare" <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:58:59 -0800

On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:37 -0800, Urias McCullough wrote:
> Hmm... couldn't the original node's content type just be changed instead?

Could have done that, but I wanted to keep the original to give the
author a chance to make an article out of the table in case he wanted
to.

Cheers,

Jorge/aka Koki

References:
- [haiku] Re: This is not an article
  - From: François Revol
- [haiku] Re: This is not an article
  - From: Jorge G. Mare
- [haiku] Re: This is not an article
  - From: Urias McCullough

Other related posts:

» [haiku] This is not an article- Jorge G. Mare
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Urias McCullough
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- François Revol
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Jorge G. Mare
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Urias McCullough
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Alexander von Gluck
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Niels Reedijk
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article - Jorge G. Mare
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Jorge G. Mare
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Austin Bales
» [haiku] Re: This is not an article- Stephan Assmus