Nathan Whitehorn wrote: ... > What is also the case, though, is that we already *have* R5. It > exists. > I'm running it. If R5 is equivalent to R1, then we have R1. So why > not > start building the cool things now? Imagine all the discussion and pulling in different directions.. :P It would be mayhem. And it would get us nowhere. ... > There is no reason to simply go blindly cloning things > if you are not planning on improving them in the process. The OpenBFS devs seem to be improving BFS while cloning it. /Jonas Sundstrom. ~ www.kirilla.com ~