[haiku] Re: Tentative approval for paying for the fliers
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:32:19 +0100
On 2009-12-24 at 22:02:04 [+0100], Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Instead of quoting your email one by one, I will try to summarize only
> the points that I think need clarification.
You've really got the nerve to reply in this way! It took me hours to write my
previous
mail, meticulously dissecting your arguments and pointing out the inappropriate
and
manipulative "discussion" techniques you use. One of those was that you quote
someone
and instead of actually replying to the quoted passage simply reiterate your
points.
This mail takes it to the next level: You don't even bother to quote me, but
disregard
my mail completely and just reiterate your points.
> I am leaving the personal
> stuff out (which I hope to clarify with you in private some day).
This is your answer to you accusing me of telling half truths and me calling
your
"bluff"? The very least I would have expected is a public apology.
Anyway, this closes the discussion for me. You are obviously not willing to
drop your
manipulative discussion style, although repeatedly having been asked to do so.
Actually
already for years, recently again by Niels, and once more by myself in my
previous
mail. IMO someone who is not willing to lead a discussion in a respectful way
is simply
not fit for participating in an open source project where public respectful
communication and discussion is a necessity.
You've recently requested to ban Alexandre for a single emotional outburst on
this
list. I find what you've being doing for years orders of magnitude worse. I
will not
request banning, but until you publicly apologize to the subscribers of the
concerned
mailing lists for your inappropriate discussion style and promise to lead
discussions
in a respectful way in the future, I will disregard your "contributions" to any
discussion. Furthermore I will consider you not being fit for any kind of
authority the
project has to offer. Should a vote be called for granting you any such
authority I
will have to cast a negative vote.
Merry X-mas to all.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
