On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The reason I keep asking (and I still do) whether Haiku Inc. will make a > _definitive as opposed to a tentative_ commitment to fund the printing is > because there has been no definitive yes or no answer to that particular > question yet than can be considered the official decision of the BOD. Why do > I say this? Because the BOD members are sending mixed signals. If they have > the authority (which I still question, but that's another matter for another > time), then the least they can do is take the time to present the official > decision as a group in unmistakable terms, not as separate mixed replies > that contradict each other. I am pretty sure I clearly expressed that I would push this forward in the BOD. I have done so and we have been discussing it. In our discussions all the board members have made their opinion known but not everyone has officially voted. I hope we can get all votes in my tomorrow. It is the holidays, only a few days from Christmas, and I think you ask too much for 5 people in 4 different time zones to discuss and make a decision quickly in a matter that has been in contention for weeks. > Hopefully I have managed to explain you why I think the way I do, and why I > still think there is an open question. I think the main issue in contention after all this discussion is whether you are asking for a guarantee that fliers you designed will be printed, even if the design is unacceptable. Since in recent emails you have repeatedly said there is no risk, then I would think not. In other words I really think we have all been wasting time here. Plus I seriously doubt your design will be unacceptable so I don't think that should be such a concern from the Haiku, Inc side. It really is sort of like a programmatic deadlock: Jorge waits on Haiku, Inc approval before working on flier design, Haiku, Inc waits on Jorge design before approval, DEADLOCK! -- Regards, Ryan