[haiku] Re: Tentative approval for paying for the fliers
- From: Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:26:09 +0100
Hi,
2009/12/23 Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Matt Madia wrote:
>>
>> GSoC Arm hardware
>
> And naturally Haiku Inc. decided to fund this purchase before the developer
> delivered any code, right?
>
>> hardware for another developer for driver development
>
> Same here, correct?
>
>> So, this is not a double standard by any means. I cannot fault you for
>> claiming that, as from your perspective it clearly seems to be the
>> case.
>>
>
> Answer the above questions and we'll then see if there is a double standard
> or not.
And again: the standard is set, you can worry about whether or not it
is a double standard, that's fine. Worry about that in private. As of
yet nobody seems to see that problem here.
Just decide whether you want to adhere to the standard or not. You are
free to choose. Even feel free to take up Urias' offer to pay for it.
Nobody will hold it against you if you do not think the rules are fair
and thus refrain from contributing the flyer.
For the others: stop feeding the troll.
N>
Other related posts:
