On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Nick <tonestone57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It only makes sense to port BOINC client if there are useful, open-source > applications to compile and run it with. Off hand I know of SETI though > there > may be a few others too. There are indeed a few others (I've run across a few in the ~75 BOINC projects I've looked at over the years), and likely there are several projects that would give us NDA access to sources to port them to a new platform. Either way, porting the client is obviously the first step :)