On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 23:51 +0100, Nicholas Blachford wrote: > I mentioned I had some suggestions and I was going to send an email. > Don't know if anyone was waiting for it but if you were, I should > point out that I've changed strategy. Since I'll be at BeGeistert > this week end I'm going to present them instead :-) > > As for the discussion on not making it easy to make distros, that is > up to the developers. Since it was nobody else but the developers who stated this stance -- both in the past as well as on this thread -- what is exactly the point of your observation? > However, if you deliberately make it difficult > to remove trademarks it could then be argued you are not making enough > effort to protect them. > I don't know about trademark law but you are legally required to > protect copyrights, you lose them if you don't. If the same is true > for trademarks, by making it difficult to remove them, you are > potentially handing any trademark infringer a *very* powerful weapon > to use against you. I think you misunderstood: this is not about making it easier or more difficult to remove anything. It is simply a matter of who does the work that has to go into creating a distro, and that should be, naturally, the distro maker. This would be no ground for violating a trademark; if somebody made such claim, it would only be an indefensible excuse. Regards, Jorge/aka Koki