On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Nicholas Blachford <nicholas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As for the discussion on not making it easy to make distros, that is up to > the developers. However, if you deliberately make it difficult to remove > trademarks it could then be argued you are not making enough effort to > protect them. I had mentioned to one or two people that maybe we need a tool to strip trademarks from an already-built Haiku image, leaving generic information instead... I think this would at least make it possible for someone to comply with our trademark policy without forcing them having to be a developer. It also wouldn't help them actually re-brand Haiku, they would have to do that themselves, or seek assistance elsewhere. Perhaps this would be a good compromize? > I don't know about trademark law but you are legally required to protect > copyrights, you lose them if you don't. If the same is true for trademarks, > by making it difficult to remove them, you are potentially handing any > trademark infringer a *very* powerful weapon to use against you. TBH, I hadn't heard that you can lose copyrights if you don't enforce them - but I admit I haven't investigated the depths of copyright law. I have however heard that you can lose trademarks if you don't enforce them. But, I think it's also not necessarily the trademark holder's job to make it easier for people to not violate their marks. I believe it's only the trademark holder's requirement to clearly communicate what constitutes a violation, and how an existing violation can be reversed. - Urias