On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Michael Phipps wrote: > >The ability to have processes (oh,sorry... teams :) ) running with > >different privileges is essential to have a secure > >system. Security is becoming more and more important for home > >users. .. and no, It's not just about keeping all your ports > >closed. Security holes in email clients and browsers can also > >compromise a system and - if we only have a single root-user - not be > >prevented from opening the ports which were supposed to be closed. > > Ah. But there is the thing. A system that has a multi-user FS (BeFS already > is) and decent login and home directory management would cure what I think > you are indicating as a problem. A multiuser FS is better, but not enough. Multiuser is not only good for TCP/IP-server software. Home users can run cron-jobs and other background tasks too while others are using the machine. And more and more home users are online 24x7 now (at least here in DK). They _will_ be running TCP/IP server software. Peter