Why not just have Screensavers and the lib export both symbols, some being virtual, the others non-virtual (so we don't change the vtable), and have the header list the correct ones ? I think this has been told already. François. Selon Michael Phipps <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Y'all remember how back in August/Sept of 2001 I said that we should shoot > for binary compatibility and see what happens? Well, I have a minor issue. > :-) > > This is sort of a continuation/explanation of what Francois was talking about > > a few weeks ago. It seems that when Be built the ScreenSaver preferences app, > > they linked against a header that had "ReservedScreenSaverX" members, where X > > varied from 1 to 8. libscreensaver.so was built against the header that ships > > with R5 that has "_ReservedScreenSaverX" members. Note the underscore. > > After a little testing, it seems that Be built their screensavers by linking > > to libscreensaver.so. All of theirs work with my code. Some developers did > the same thing. Axel's very cool (according to my 8 year old) Nebula > screensaver, for example, works just fine. But some (Matrix, for one) > screensavers that did what the BeBook recommends and link against the > ScreenSaver preferences app instead of libscreensaver.so will not work. They > > fail to load because there are missing symbols. > > So. I can go about this a couple of ways. > 1) I can have one header. That would break certain screensavers, but would > make a lot of build and use sense. It would correct the weirdness on a going > > forward basis. The downside is that some screensavers would break. > > 2) I can make a duplicate header that has no underscores and build my > ScreenSaver prefs with it. That complicates our source tree but keeps > everything working. > > So I have a request for all of you. > Will you please look to see what screensaver you are running? If it is not a > > stock Be one (BuyNow, Flip, Icons, Lens, Lissart, Message, Spiral, Spots, > StringTheme, SuperString, Blackness), will you find out where you got it from > > and see if source is available? If not (and you absolutely love it), let me > know. > > If I don't get a flood of "save my Matrix" type emails, I will go with option > > 1. :-) > > Michael > > --