Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2011-01-06 at 14:38:19 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > Since that field is just a status marker (and not used internally), > > we > > could change the text to something like: > > "Pending (42. failure)" > Hm, but weren't we the ones that cared about binary compatibility? > There are > apps out there that actually query for "Pending" mails ;-) Ouch :-) I didn't remember that MDR introduced the flags field (if it did?) - with localization, having that (pretty much free form) attribute read "Pending", and "Error" probably isn't a good idea anyway. And I guess Beam could be fixed :-)) Bye, Axel.