[openbeos] Re: Post-mortems: a suggested method for continuous improvements (fwd)
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:52:16 +0100 (MET)
Seems to me the only thing your friend saw on BeBits was a link to the news
on BeGroovy on the headlines.
Nothing got posted at BeBits AFAIK
En réponse à David Sowsy <dsowsy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > > Is Bruno G. Albuquerque the idiot that made this 'release' public
> > > knowledge on BeBits?
> >
> > Excuse me? Do you have a problem? Why exactly am I am idiot? I guess I
>
> > missed something here.
>
> Sorry, didn't mean to shoot the messenger. It apparently was Michael
> Phipps decision to make a release of the code. Read into that whatever
> you
> may. Something like a release on open-beos.sourceforge.net I expected to
>
> see as *his* posting. I wasn't sure exactly whose strings were being
> pulled.
>
> > Anyway, I did not make anything public. I did not decide to release
> > anything. But I am full behind the people who decided to do that
> > because if it was not due to their work this project would not even
> > exist.
> >
> > Everything in life should be taken as an example be it good or bad.
> You
> > may bet everyone learned a lot with this release.
>
> Until yesterday I wasn't even aware it *was* a release.
> Right now Joe Q. Public would've actually assumed that this was OBOS R1,
>
> and that's how it got back to me; from a friend that is a
> non-programmer
> who got all excited because he saw the link on BeBits.
>
> > -Bruno
>
> . * * * . \|/ * * , . * ' * .
> . . * , * --*-- . ` * , . * , .
> David Sowsy . /|\ BeOS Rebel and Coder . * .
> http://dsowsy.nanorevolution.com . * . * . .
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
