On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:49:29PM -0400, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Pete Goodeve <pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > I'm not too enthused by schemes like this. My Ubuntu system kindly > > provides such repositories, but they tend to stay empty, as I usually > > have other ideas as to organization. > > Obviously there is never really a perfect "one-size-fits-all" solution > to something like this, but I personally agree with Justin that a set > of default folders for common file types would be useful. One that I > think we definitely need is Downloads, Indeed... That is certainly one of my most used ones. In fact it tends to collect way too much stuff "that I'll keep for a while" and never get round to moving or deleting! (Again, though, it's never the default in 'home'. I always specify it in the common partition.) > > > What might be more useful than specific default folders would > > be user-specifiable path lists, like the other current environment > > variable '...PATH's: "PICTURE_PATH", "MUSIC_PATH", and so on. > > How about they be defined as find_directory constants which can be > changed using a preference tool? > > find_directory(B_USER_DOWNLOADS_DIRECTORY) > > Those could then we easily exported in the Terminal usind the finddir > tool if you wanted the above environment variables. But find_directory returns a (single) BPath, doesn't it? I was thinking more of allowing a set of folders to be specified, as in the environment variable "PATH". I like Axel/Francois' thoughts of tagging folders with suitable attributes, though. -- Pete --