[openbeos] Re: POSIX headers
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 03:16:20 +0200 CEST
"Adi Oanca" <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > You just need to add the function prototype to the header, you
> > don't
> > have to implement the function. Just take the same declaration as
> > found
> > in the original BeOS header and you're done.
> > We are an open source project, if you miss something do something
> > against it (bother the one who is responsible, and if there is
> > none, do
> > it yourself).
> Is there none? :-)))
I want to talk to my lawyer now :)
> OK, I'll see what I can do.
That sounds better :))
> > > How can we build, if we don't have basic functionality, like
> > > round() for example...
> > Oh, how could we survive the last year without *THAT* function in
> > our
> > headers? Who cares?
> Do you think I am the ONLY one who misses it? round() is a very
> popular
> function...you know...
Maybe we can talk it into joining our headers... maybe even its not-so-
popular friends, lround() and llround().
> > > Didn't you guys said some time ago, that we'll use R5's
> > > libroot.so until ours is done?
> > What do you mean by this? We use BeOS libraries when we link an R5
> > app,
> > we use our libraries when we build an OpenBeOS app, and we always
> > use
> > our headers.
> Sorry! I wanted to say R5's POSIX headers.
Okay, it's much easier to check our headers in a daily use - as you
obviously learned, that way, we are able to track down missing function
prototypes, etc :-)
Adios...
Axel.
Other related posts:
