On 7/26/07, Salvatore Benedetto <emitrax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anyway, talking about scheduling and nice command, instead of having an O(1) > scheduler, which I'm not a fan of, why > not having a scheduler that gets it right 95% of the time, as Con says in > his interview, and then give the user > the possibility to choose which application should get more attention by the > CPU by simply right clicking on the top bar > of the window application, instead of having to open a terminal and use > nice? This would allow user to decide which > application would slow down under heavy load by simpling do some 'nice > clicking' on it :-). > Even 'stop' an application, instead of closing it. > > Salvo My step-brother showed me an application for Mac OS X which does exactly that. It was great. He paused all running processes, giving PhotoShop the system all to itself. He also paused PS and then resumed it, so you could see the loading splash screen for PS pause then resume. Very cool application. -- Craig Magina