On Fri, 17 May 2002, Isaac Yonemoto wrote: > This seems like a good idea. Each user gets x number of negative > votes. The items with a certain number of negative votes go away. Then a > new round begins. Be it negative or positive votes, I'm strongly pro voting for more than one name in the first round. I would be totally desparate having to pick exactly one out of 3000 names. CU, Ingo