Ingo Weinhold wrote: > Please don't bother with BFS. BFS indices aren't particularly good for the > kind of queries one would want to run for content searches. It is fine for > string matches of the form "foo*", but it isn't for "*[fF][oO][oO]*" like > ones. The index will not help when searching for "*foo" in a SQL database either. BFS indices are case sensitive? Wouldn't most queries benefit more from a canonized index?