> "base system" is a bit fuzzy. IMO, the svn repository should only contain > open source software available as under a free license. Regarding optional > packages (or later packages installable via the package manager), closed > source software is fine by me, but I think I'd prefer our releases to > contain free software only, respectively at least make non-free software an > opt-in installation option. "base system" would be what you get when building from svn trunk without any optional package. So, Anthy could still be integrated to releases and that's fine for me, but please consider open sourcing it so we can take care of building it when we want to get an ARM version, for example... -- Adrien Destugues / PulkoMandy Elève ingénieur ENSSAT EII1- www.enssat.fr GSoC student for Haiku - http://haiku-os.org GrafX2 project team - http://code.google.com/p/grafx2