"Leon Timmermans" <openbeos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BeOSD is not a weird suggestion at all. > Windows proves that there is a need for *easy to configure* servers, > not for > ultra reliable/scalable server that are able to handle loads as *ux/ > bsd can. > If OBOS could become stable (something like Lin*x), secure and admin > friendly, it > would be a succesfull server. Definitely - but it's a whole load of work, and we're not concentrating on this for R1. I want to have OpenBeOS capable of everything that I could personally need anyway some day :-) Bye, Axel.