Scott Dellinger wrote on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:26:16 -0400: > True. The reiserfs people seem to be chatting about this, too, but > they don't have such a concept yet. It's a neat filesystem with a lot > of advantages, but it doesn't have all the features needed for, say, a > BFS replacement. Maybe eventually. It would be a really good base for building a new BFS on. Great storage engine. Just add indexing and attributes as children of files (except for those evil "trk/Blah" attribute names Tracker uses). - Alex