what do you mean natively. bypass the whole beapi? if yeah, then id never give up my fave api in the whole wide world :) If you mean build it on top of the beapi then that would work too, but thats going to go on the LaterTODO list hehe -yt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zenja Solaja" <zenja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "OpenBeOS" <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:11 PM Subject: [openbeos] Konqueror update (plus radical proposal) > > Hi everyone. Just a quick note that I've uploaded BeBits with a weely > snapshot of konqueror-embedded (http://www.bebits.com/app/2422). There > is also a touchy screenshot at: http://members.optushome.com.au/beoz/ > konqueror.jpg. > > Having said that, I'm about to start a 'dangerous' thread on this list. > I'm pretty sure that it will flush out some of the lurkers on this > list, and may even entice Helmar to start posting again :-) > > Here is my proposal - OpenBeOS urgently tackles the port of native Qt > (without X11) to BeOS. A native port of Qt-2.3.1 will open the > floodgates of hundreds of KDE applications, including a more functional > Konqueror, a port of KOffice (and its components) and countless other > apps. This is a perfect project to mould the OpenBeOS group (emphasis > on MOULD). The Interface Kit group can gain experience porting a > foreign display API to BeOS, and the networking team can also gain > valuable experience with refining the Konqueror port. > > I can think of hundreds of reasons why OpenBeOS should tackle this > project, and only one reason why it shouldn't. As I've previously > stated, this project will help MOULD the OpenBeOS group, and everyone > will benefit from the experience (developers and whats left of the > community). > > I apologise for infecting the list with my sinister motives. >