Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But what we need from the people on this list is the understanding > that an email from me or Urias or Matt or Axel does not automatically > represent the "Haiku, Inc. response". In fact I think we should move > the role of Haiku, Inc. to strictly about managing the donations, the > use of that donated money and resources bought with that money, and > trademarks. Not some "ultimate decider" in all things Haiku related. But that's exactly what Haiku Inc. already is, IMO. But since it's managing the trademarks, it would be in charge of pursuing violations, if no one else does it before. Bye, Axel.