I apologize for hurting your feelings. I did not intend to at all. I don't care how many people lurk. The more, the merrier. I hope that tons of qualified, interested, enthusiastic coders sign up to help. I look forward to reading your bug reports. :-) >"Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Anyway - as far as the concentration of work, we have a vast quantity of >>lurkers. The list >is >at 80-85 subscribers. Maybe 10 people actively signed up for anything. I >planned for >having >more active participants. As we leave the planning stages, we will >need to get more >>commitments or backtrack on what we can do. > >I do not see myself as a lurker. I am one of the 70 people that read but do >not contribute >actively. Everyone will have his/her personal reasons, for me it is that I do >not have any time >because of learning for upcoming exams (biology diploma) and I am not a coder >so I could >not contribute because I am simply not able to. I can do "Hello World" in a >window, but >that's it. >But I am interested in how the project develops. > >And please see it also in another way: Now that Be, Inc. is practically dead, >people do not >know how it will go on. A lot of people have very strong hopes for the >OpenBeOS project, >and while they never heard anything from Be, here is the chance to just >subscribe to a >mailinglist to keep being informed. We have missed that for a long time. So I >think it is quite >normal that there are a lot of interested people. We/you should be happy about >everybody >that is still interested. > >Maybe I am a lurker but I do not feel bad about it. If you do not want it the >way it is now >you should think about a closed mailing list and weekly newsletters or >something like that. But >I cannot see in which way people that just read but do not write in the >mailinglist could >disturb. > >Sorry for being a bit emotional but I felt kind of attacked personally so I >had to defend >myself :-) > >Bye, >Finn > > >