> Okay. That seems fair enough to me. I wouldn't need to open source > anything coded by my colleagues, would I? They love open source, but They seem to have a quite unidirectional love for FOSS :P > they're a bit iffy on open sourcing any work they do. I'm guessing > that we wouldn't have to because we're producing third-party > applications that have a totally separate license to the OS itself. It should be. Just be careful with the GPLed parts. > I don't think an ARM desktop would be financially viable. Again, > going > back to Jon Smith, he probably hasn't heard of anything other than > the > Mac, Windows, Microsoft, Intel and AMD (at a stretch). Saying "Buy > the > NuBox, it has an ARM CPU!" would just be greeted with confused > expressions and mild alienation. Even if Haiku ran on an ARM > processor, it wouldn't be anywhere near as advanced as the x86 > version > is right now, which would delay a working prototype. Well, ARM netbooks are getting there, and there definitely is a niche for PPC machines for ex (new Amiga likes (SAM440...)), and there are some interesting ARM things that would make nice thin clients like the Efika MX... But yes making things and going frontal with the PC would probably get people confused, unless you have the money to make such a distinctive mark as "mac"... it's just M$' monopoly's fault. François.