/bin/bash POWAHHHHHHHH !!! Erf, big troll sorry; commign back from week end :^) btw. any news on the parallel port ? I'll read all benewsletter talking about PCI and ISA, driver, bus manager... surely there's some things I missed... then check some driver codes. François. En réponse à Michael Phipps <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > NOOOOO!!! Not the scripting wars! :-) > For those who don't remember, there was a ... I think month long > conversations > running back and forth on BeDevTalk back in the 90's about this. > The Be Line (which I happened to agree with) was that including a > scripting language > doesn't make sense. Why? > 1) Picking one rules out others. You like Python. Cool. Others like > ARexx. Others like other things. > 2) The Scripting API allows you to use many different scripting > languages. Personally, I think that this might be the coolest piece of > all. You like Python? I like AWK. We can write for each other's apps, if > they are scriptable. > 3) No matter which one you choose, someone will be unhappy. > > Personally, I think that Be was wise to be scripting language > agnostic. > OTOH, distros of OBOS could include any, all or no scripting > languages. > > >I would personally love to see Bethon (the Be API bindings for python), > > >or something like it included in the obos thing. > >Python is a ridiculously powerful and simple language and making beos > > >GUI apps with it is a breeze. Even outside the > >bindings to the API, python is quite powerful in its own right. Its > >use extends far beyond doing GUI construction. And > >as near as I can tell, pyhton could be compiled on whatever platforms > > >obos ends up running on, which would make the > >app nice and crossplatformy. > >I just posted my first app to bebits, and it was done entirely in > >python. As a total newbie to programming and OOP and > > all that jazz, I can attest to the ease of this language, not to > >mention the Be API. > > > >Anyway...some thoughts > > > > > > > > > > >