On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
<oliver.ruiz.dorantes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm willing to help out, but as their questions become more c/c++
specific my use quickly diminishes.
In any case helping students with the setup of the environment, and first
touch with the OS, is something that does not require c/C++ and would unload
another mentor's workload....
This I feel confident helping with.
Should people willing to do this be listed as 'backup mentors' or
should we include some statement in the application to the tune of :
"To increase response time, we are employing assistant mentors. Their
job is to assist students with non-project specific issues, which
includes general building, compilation, and development environment."
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Salvatore Benedetto <emitrax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We had both in the last two years, and you can see how it ended up. Going public
doesn't ncessarily mean you have to follow the discussion. It only
means, that if you
want, you can either follow and/or help.
I agree. The lack of transparency was an issue last year.
What about agreeing to include a subject header to indicate the email
is intended for anyone to read?
That would allow students and mentors to use a mail filter to identify
such emails.
