Ankur Sethi <get.me.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > In my personal opinion because we are already employing Stephan to > > work on this project we may not want to put GSoC resources into it. > > In > > general there are plenty of people who can and will work on this > > even > > when Stephan has moved on to other things. > Ah. Since it was listed on the ideas page, I thought it was still a > part of GSoC. What does Stephan think about this? > > I'm interested in Web+ as a project because I want to work on > something I use regularly. [...] Which is always a good idea; personally, I think that Web+ has enough of room left to fill a GSoC with. Things like: * add-on interface, best a compatible one to some existing * search add-ons (also compatible with what there is in other browsers (open search or whatever the name)) * insert another layer between the BWebView and WebCore that allows the latter to run in a dedicated process per page. That would also allow to move Web+ into our repository, and build it there (as the GCC2 BWebView would not link, but only communicate with the GCC4 WebCore process). * Network cache * persistent forms/passwords * more convenience functions * more settings * ... Bye, Axel.