On 2007-01-29 at 23:19:01 [+0000], DarkWyrm <darkwyrm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Seg, Janeiro 29, 2007 7:37 am, Thom Holwerda escreveu: > > > > > BeFS, this might not be a problem at all. > > > > It is BFS, not BeFS. :P > It actually depends on who you talk to unless I remember wrong. Anyone > with familiarity with BeOS knows it's BFS, but for some bizarre reason, > Linux refers to it as BeFS (or at least did last I knew). Thats because it has another supported filesystem that uses the term BFS - SCO UNIXWARE Boot File System IIRC. Cian