> On 2002.01.16, at 12:25, Axel Dörfler wrote: > > > When people "upgrade" to R1 they will expect at least some changes, > > so > > why disappointing them? ;-)) > So you are against the idea of starting by having a R5 equivalent? No no, don't get me wrong, I just wanted to consider alternatives that won't take more time to implement than the original behaviour. Some kind of "Forward thinking", but perhaps it takes to much time to discuss the viable alternatives, so just do it later :-) Adios... Axel.