On 2007-08-04 at 02:56:48 [+0200], Salvatore Benedetto <emitrax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/4/07, Andrew McCall <andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/08/07, Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > > > My apologies for being a pain in the butt, but we are really running > > > against the clock. > > > > > > Can somebody from Haiku please reply whether it is OK or not to use the > > > Haiku logo for promotional material to be used at FalterCon? > > > > Who needs to give you the go ahead? Is it Haiku, Inc.? > > > > If this is the case, it seems Micheal Phipps is the only person who > > can say yes, and something seems very wrong with that. > > > > Can "the community" say yes? if so, I am sure a yes vote from most of > > the current active developers would suffice (Axel? Bonefish? > > DarkWrym?). > > I'm speechless. Seriously. I totally agree with Andrew. > > Anyway, why are the most active developers not part of the Haiku Inc? Because they don't want to and there's no need to either. The decision will be made by the admin team and we're currently voting. FWIW I voted for allowing the use of the logo for promotional material excluding a Haiku CD. IMHO nobody should distribute an official Haiku version until we've reached at least alpha state. And yes, I discriminate between mirroring the daily builds on a server which requires testers to proactively download them, and pushing CDs to people who might never have heard of Haiku before. CU, Ingo