[openbeos] Re: CVS service problems

  • From: "Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:12:11 -0400

Pretty much what Axel said. 
We are getting new web hosting when we post the new site. 
We also (will) have email accounts set up for all of the devs and we are 
setting up CVS there.
We aren't going to switch CVS right away, though. There is too much "proving 
out" that has to happen before we are willing to jump ship. But there is a 
backup plan in place if things at SF.net don't improve. 

>Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hey folks...  This situation has not improved *at* *all* since Marcus 
>> sent
>> this e-mail on June 30th.
>Well dunno, I am not using anonymous CVS anymore...
>> When the anonymous cvs server is up, it's really slow.  And,
>> unfortunately, it's not up all that often.  To make matters worse, it
>> appears that the nightly tarball isn't available any more.
>They are, I posted a news item not so long ago on the site:
>I don't know about their CVS tarballs, but I would be surprised if they 
>wouldn't work anymore.
>> Maybe it's time to look into an alternate hosting facility.
>We are sure looking into that, but SF provides very good services in 
>general - not only because they are free.
>CVS updates are really fast since they moved the anonymous CVS to 
>another server, it's really nice to work with for a developer.
>Their problems with anonymous CVS and also the WebCVS suck, though. But 
>even if it takes another month, I am sure they'll work it out.
>   Axel.

Other related posts: