[openbeos] Re: Building OpenBFS...
- From: Linus Almstrom <linalm-7@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:20:06 +0200
There is no difference between PE and Pro in that aspect. In fact... The
difference between PE and Pro is close to none.
On 2002-04-29 at 23:01:35 [+0200], openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Is this possibly a PE vs Pro difference?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno G. Albuquerque [mailto:bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April
> 29, 2002 4:32 PM
> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: Building OpenBFS...
>
>
> > > Comment out the ofending line. That's all you need to do.
> > >
> > > (Line 217 of kernel_interface.cpp, if it is not clear)
> >
> > Simple enough... I didn't want to start editing code like that without
> > really understanding what I was doing first :-) I'll give that a shot.
>
> The problem is is that load_driver_symbols() should be defined in one of
> the R5 headers. And it is actually defined in some but not in others. And
> we really do not know why.
>
> -Bruno
Other related posts:
