[openbeos] Re: Building OpenBFS...

  • From: "Daniel Reinhold" <danielr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:28:24 CDT

This is not the only module that uses load_driver_symbols().  The net 
stack does too. So will any other kernel add-on. Why have each module 
do a fix up when you can simply make sure a good, correct header file 
is in the source tree?


>> What???
>> 
>> That header should be replaced with a correct one and put into our 
>> sources. And put into the next installation preferably. This is much 
>> better than having people edit header files themselves (and 
>> potentially 
>> screw them up).
>
>They can just comment out the line in question - there is no need to 
>screw up any headers files.
>Since it's a problem of *some* of the Be headers, I don't want to add 
>the whole header file - other kernel drivers will have the same 
>problem, and it would be a bit dumb to have this header in every 
driver 
>folder.
>
>The simple solution would be to just add the prototype to the 
>kernel_interface.cpp file, that way it should always compile without 
>any problems.
>
>Adios...
>   Axel.
>
>
>

Other related posts: