Am Freitag, den 19.12.2008, 13:40 -0500 schrieb Raymond C. Rodgers: > Stephan Assmus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When people print documentation, they will most likely print it on paper > > made out of the Great Bear Rain Forrest and similar last resorts of Nature. > > > > I wouldn't actively put thought into making it easy for people to print. Do > > you know what the per head consumption of paper is, especially in the US? > > It's completely off the scale and it's getting more, not less. > > > > Best regards, > > -Stephan > > > > > > Well, not to be hostile or start an argument but in those terms, why > don't we just go ahead and remove the printing support from Haiku? That > will prevent anyone from consuming paper [via Haiku at least], and > reduce the damage done to the environment that way. Don't get me wrong, > I think that printing is occasionally necessary, and I do agree that it > can be very wasteful and damaging to the environment in multiple ways, > but I think that if the operating system is going to support printing, > then people are going to print regardless of what format the > documentation may be in. Whether it looks right when it's printed or > not, people are going to do it as long as there is printing support. So > why fight a document file format because it looks right when printed? My point was that my priorities would not be to use a documentation format that has it's strenths primarily when printing, *even* if many users may want to print it. I just cannot support that. But instead, I find it more important to have great hypertext capabilities. That makes documentation so much more useful. Therefor, I find HTML much better suited. I am not even saying don't use PDF because it's worse at hypetext features than HTML (hm), I just refuse to recommend it, because it supports printing better. There is really tons of situations where people print stuff for no *really* good reason and that's just not justifiable and one should not support it with giving it consideration. Best regards, -Stephan