Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Though, now that I think of it, I never liked this return value/error > code > multiplexing. The IMHO straight forward way is to return a status_t > and > pass the data back through a reference parameter. This is more > flexible > anyway, since it works for any data type. I think that's the best solution - the other would be the use of exceptions :-) Bye, Axel.