[openbeos] Re: Apache 2.0
- From: Ted Leeuwesteijn <thirdrock@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:50:12 +0200
Hello Nick Derewianka you emitted about [openbeos] Re: Apache 2.0
>i have checked david's apache 2.0 site (which he himself notes is out
>of date), i have checked the perl script from bebits.com that uses wget
>to download and build apache (its broken in the URL its trying to
>receive - but the ./configure options are exactly what i used).
Yeah David is working on other issues now :))
The email went away before i was done, got a few phonecall s while i was
writing it.
>What i dont know right now is: is this a simple fix of a misconfigured
>file or is it emblematic of further problems on the BeOS portions of
>apache 2.0.
i could give it a try on my beos box, but i dunnow if it will work on any
non bone install.
>.. yes there is the webserver kit with apache 1.3.24 - but i am
>currently more interested in getting 2.0 to compile painlessly from the
>nightly snapshot.
There is also somewere one or more compiled 2.0xxx version of apache on one
of the Muscle servers, just get BeShare from BeBits and browse the servers
for apache there should be severall builds of that available. It might help
you on your way to trace the problem.
>Furthermore - does anyone know if bebits is currently in active
>maintenance ?? ie are apps being checked to see if they even work
>anymore ??
yuo can repoprt the bad links with the butt next to itSean Heber the admin
there has integrated that to make shure that it gets known which downloads
are bad and good, eventually he will take action at a certen time.
For specifics ask Sean directly.
>Regards,
>Nick
Grts
Ted.
Other related posts:
