> Hi Tom, > > > What I > > was trying to imply was that simply *because* the Haiku project > > contacted Access about the docs, *they* finally got around to be a > > bit more open about the whole Zeta issue [...] > > Even from the very first comment from David, it looks to me like the > reason > to say something *now* is the "thread" from Bernd in his final words, > that > he is looking into which parts of ZETA might be open sourced. Looks > like > ACCESS really wants to prevent that from happening. > Again please, stay focussed :) If you really want to answer to ppl on this off-topic thread, then please answer privately. Thanks. François.