Niels, I would like to help with the testing of the system as it gets migrated over to the new server. Let me know when and I will make myself as available as possible during that timeframe. Serpentor On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Jorge Mare <kokitomare@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> I think what happened is that we were going to try to do the server > >> migration and upgrade to Drupal 5.x at the same time. But it does not > >> look like we are upgrading Drupal anytime soon, so we might as well do > >> the server migration and get over with it first (that way we can kiss > >> WF goodbye!). IIRC, we will have to migrate the email (to Gmail?), > >> right? > > > > I would like to gently disagree about not upgrading Drupal soon. > > If there are people willing to work on the Drupal upgrade, then I > agree. But if we struggle to find people/time for the upgrade, then we > should not delay the server migration because of this, as we have an > ISP contract renewal deadline that we cannot miss. The Drupal upgrade > can happen after the server migration. > > > The > > test migration I did a while back, which can be found at > > http://experimental.web.haiku-os.org/, is pretty good. It needs some > > polishing, but basically the data and the functionality migrate. > > Things to do are: > > - I found two instances where we lose some data. > > - Several modules have not yet been enabled again (such as the phpbb > module). > > - The theme still needs some minor tweaks: the one on the main website > > evolved since I did the port. I would suggest actually doing the > > development of the theme in the mercurial repository in order to keep > > track of the changes. > > The theme is an asset that was created by non-programmers, and while I > understand why the developers would want to put it in a version > control system repo, I think this would have the effect of > marginalizing the very creators of the theme by leaving them out of > the contribution process by imposing a tool we do not use. This is not > nice, to say the least. Please remember: we are not programmers and > don't know have the skills to use such a system, and most probably > have no time or interest in learning it either (at least I know that I > don't). > > We went through this before, on this list, and in that occasion, after > some discussion Axel was gracious enough to acknowledge that it should > be up to the creators of the theme; I thought we had put this topic to > rest back then, but apparently not... :/ > > > So basically I imagined it like this: I'd suggest I fix the last known > > issues in the theme. Then we plan a weekend where we do the migration. > > I'd suggest just finding a web of volunteers that try the migrated > > site and through an IRC channel communicate with a few of us admins so > > we can touch up the site where needed. > > I like the idea; I would try to be there if the meeting is scheduled > with enough advance notice. > > A few observations based on a quick look to the experimental site: > > * Templates still need to be modified > > * Breadcrumbs seem to be missing from the Community & Development sections > > * Image embedding is missing from content creation forms (unless I am > missing something); our current 4.x solution for this is suboptimal, > but Drupal 5.x has some neat modules that would make adding images to > content and managing them very easy; IMCE module comes to mind: > > http://drupal.org/project/imce > > * We may consider adding wysiwyg editing; they were pretty crappy back > in the days when we created the site, but they have matured a lot, and > a few are quite usable now. > > Jorge > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List > >