> > > Finally, remember that it's nice to setup bounties, but you have to find > a developer who wants to work on the features. I would start by asking > the developers how they want to be paid and what they would like to work > on (which is what Haiku, Inc. is doing). Bounties that don't get claimed > are useless. > All these arguments are valid for GSOC too though. > > And once again, bountysource is up and running and waiting for people to > inject money into it. Karl, you can advertise this at Haikuware. We can > also add information about it on the Haiku website. But I still think > this doesn't need to involve Haiku, Inc. They CAN donate to bounties > there if they decide that's a good way to spend their money. > It is very strange. Haiku Inc. can get involved in funding decisions for contract work, but not for bounties? I just wanted to try to show that major corporations with a lot more money than Haiku Inc. use this method, and it can be successful. I don't understand how it hurts to publicize a different way of fundraising and work. It is just a bonus if someone applies. I believe it was you yourself that admitted that you would consider bounties if they were attractive enough - so make them attractive enough. Only Haiku Inc. can make these decisions. > -- > Adrien. > > -- Karl vom Dorff BScH Biology (German Minor) numbdesign.com