'lo all, Earlier in the weekend, aldeck talked with me about some possibilities with the TM policy. Here's some of the ideas : TM Policies: Debian : http://www.debian.org/trademark Red Hat : http://www.redhat.com/about/companyprofile/trademark Ubuntu : http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy Software Freedom Law Center's sample : http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-700005.6 To note, so far i've only looked into Debian -- so, this is in no way a bias against the other groups. An interesting tidbit: back in 2003, Debian announced that their current policy is {{{ neither well known enough, clear enough, complete enough, or legally enforceable. A better policy is therefore needed. }}} The two drafted policies are linked under a "Work in Progess" section on their page. In other words, I find it comforting that their is a larger & well established organization who also has some work to sort out on their TM policies. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/10/msg00003.html At least one of Debian's WIP TM policies makes mention of having dual-trademarks. One logo that has the typical restrictions and is intended for official use only and a secondary mark with a much more permissive MIT-like usage policy. This would be perfect, as it preserves our beautiful HAIKU logo and provides HUGs (and anyone else) the ability to create derivative graphics for their website and other bits. http://wiki.debian.org/ProposedTrademarkPolicy I guess in this upcoming week, I'll analyze those TM policies to summarize each of them. Hopefully this'll encourage more people to learn the basics of them and to comment on which aspects would be nice to have or not. As we know, we're currently limited with CafePress -- eg they've only shops in the US & UK. Realistically, purchasing goods from them simply isn't worth for people elsewhere. Debian even has some nice ideas on selling Trademarked goods. Basically, they let many 3rd party *businesses* to sell goods -- both CD/DVD and other hard goods. I'm not yet sure of all the details of the process -- eg, are there min/max guidelines, is there a pool of graphics for the vendors to choose from, what freedom the vendors have with altering/modifying the graphics. But there seems to be a free-market aspect, a suggestion from Debian to use vendors that allow the user to pay extra money (which becomes a donation to Debian), and the promise that companies who receive service complaints will be removed from Debian's page. http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ http://www.debian.org/misc/merchandise WIP policy: http://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/WorkInProgress/HaikuTrademarkPolicy --mmadia